skip to main |
skip to sidebar
20(ish) questions and problems in bringing about real democracy
- why previous attempts at communes or intentional communities fail / succeed
- how do we make real democracy something useful to groups working on local campaigns
- how do we move from democratic single issue campaigns where everyone essentially agrees, to geographically based democratic communities (DCs).
- should DCs be geographically based at all, what are the alternatives
- what size should DCs be
- how can DCs claim legitimacy when only a small proportion of people in an area are involved
- what can DCs do to try and be representative of people that are not yet involved
- how do DCs encourage people to get involved.
- how do DCs interact with existing structures (especially those that call themselves 'democratic')
- what can DCs actually do for their members and wider society rather than being talking shops
- how can we answer the critics who see small communities as backward looking, tribal, inefficient etc
- wont people be spending their whole life doing meetings and administration - leaving no time for productive work?
- should DCs aim for complete self sufficiency
- how do we prevent DCs coming into conflict with neighbouring communities
- what structures can we build to help democratic communities work together, without these larger scale structures becoming like current hierachies
- when we have truly DCs what's to stop them doing the things we criticise current states for (aggression, repression etc)
- who is a member of a community - residents, visitors, family/friends of residents - what rights should they have (IE should visitiors be welcome but denied the right to block) how do we define that?
- do all members have instant involvement (should people who move in have equal rights straight away, can new born babies block motions !?)
- how should DCs deal with dissent - should they exclude people (from processes or in extreme cases completely exile them) what alternatives might there be to this
- should decisions be binding
- how can people be 'accountable'
- how should communities deal with immigration, when more people might impede or eventually prevent consensus decision making)
- should democratic communities allow themselves to divide / combine - (surely combining could lead to building state or large corporation type structures)